Quayson reports Attorney General to Disciplinary Committee of General Legal Council

The Member of Parliament for Assin North Constituency, James Gyakye Quayson, has reported the Attorney General, Godfred Yeboah Dame to the General Legal Council (GLC) on an alleged ground of professional misconduct in the handling of his criminal trial at the High Court in Accra.

Quayson who is on trial on a charge of perjury and forgery in a letter dated July 25, 2023, and addressed to the Chairman of the Disciplinary Committee of the General Legal Council, stated, “I respectfully seek to initiate disciplinary proceedings against the Honourable Attorney General, Godfred Yeboah Dame for his professional misconduct during and in respect of my criminal trial in the High Court, Criminal Division 3, Accra.”

The Assin North legislator said at the last adjourned date of his trial on July 19, 2023, during the cross-examination of the first prosecution witness, Richard Takyi-Mensah, after the witness had testified confirming that he had given a statement to the police to which he attached certain documents, which testimony is also reflected in the police statement itself, the Attorney-General, responding to an application by his counsel for disclosure of the attachments the witness referred to, stated that there were no attachments to the said police statement.

Below is is what is contained in Mr Quayson’s report

REPORT OF PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT BY THE HONOURABLE ATTORNEY GENERAL, GODFREY YEBOAH DAME

I respectfully seek to initiate disciplinary proceedings against the Honourable Attorney General, Godfrey Yeboah Dames for his professional misconduct during and in respect of my criminal trial in the High Court, Criminal Division 3, Accra. At the last adjourned date (19th July, 2023), during the cross-examination of the first prosecution witness, Richard Takyi-Mensah, after the witness had testified confirming that he had given a statement to the police to which he attached certain documents, which testimony is also reflected in the police statement itself, the Attorney-General, responding to an application by my counsel for disclosure of the attachments the witness referred to, stated that there were no attachments to the said police statement. This clearly amounted to providing testimony to the court which, I am advised and believe to be true, is clearly contrary to the rules of professional conduct by lawyers in a case.

The “testimony” provided by the Attorney-General contradicted the testimony of his own witness and was presented for the first time without any prior notice to my lawyers or myself as to the facts known to the prosecution. Significantly, after the intervention of the Attorney-General, when my counsel asked the witness whether he still stood by his testimony that he had attached documents to his police statement, the witness would not provide an answer to the question. In effect, the testimony of the witness had been ‘influenced by the professionally improper testimony of the Attorney-General. My counsel has applied for a certified true copy of the proceedings before the trial court on that day and I will make this available to the Disciplinary Committee as soon as it becomes available.

There are also the following further instances of professional misconduct on the part of the Attorney-General. On 16th June 2023, when my lawyer was seeking to bring to the attention of the court that I was a candidate in the then pending Parliamentary bye-election in the Assin North Constituency, the Attorney-General used the following insulting language against me: “This is what I describe as a very totally irresponsible step. Beside it, to apply to contest again when he knew that these proceedings were pending for which he can go to jail” This gratuitous insult on the part of the Attorney-General was without any basis and had no place in the trial and, I am advised by my lawyers, is contrary to the Rules of Professional Conduct of lawyers. I attach herewith the record of proceedings before the court on 16th June 2023 during which the Attorney-General made the insulting remarks I am complaining of.

The Attorney-General has also misconducted himself by his granting of at least one media interview in relation to my case.

The Attorney-General has claimed in court that his comments followed a decision of the Supreme Court in respect of an application for an interlocutory injunction restraining me from performing my duties as Member of Parliament and were not in respect of my criminal trial. It is my understanding that the rules of professional conduct do not allow lawyers to grant media interviews in respect of cases they are handling.

Source: graphic online