POLITICS

Minority questions absence of E-levy from Parliament’s Business Statement

Some members of the Minority caucus in Parliament have questioned the absence of the controversial Electronic Transfer levy from the Business Statement for the fifth week ending February 25, 2022.

This comes days after the leadership of the Majority in Parliament disclosed that the government will no longer withdraw and re-lay the E-levy bill, as earlier communicated.

The Member of Parliament for Ellembelle, Emmanuel Armah Kofi Buah asked the Majority to declare its stance on the levy to clarify any misconception.

“It [E-levy] is not even in our business statement this week. We want to know the direction of government on that E-levy policy. If it is no longer a priority, please let us know.”

The Member of Parliament for Juaboso, Kwabena Mintah Akandoh, also made a similar call in Parliament, saying “May I know when the E-levy [bill] will be brought back to the floor of the House? I say that because some members of the honourable House are going round telling Ghanaians that some of us are secretly supporting E-levy”.

Reacting to the concerns, the Deputy Majority Leader, Alexander Afenyo-Markin, urged the Minority to build consensus with the majority in passing the e-levy bill.

“…Yesterday we considered the Sputnik report by consensus. Why don’t we do same for the e-levy?”

Previous efforts to discuss the bill on the floor of Parliament have not materialized.

Currently, the national conversation has been around the government pushing through the controversial 1.75% electronic transfer levy estimated to rake in some $1 billion annually or sign up on the IMF program.

Some analysts have proposed seeking an IMF bailout as a better alternative amidst public disapproval of the E-levy, but the government has said it will have none of that.

Others have also brushed off calls for the government to go under an IMF programme insisting that the options left for Ghana to consider are fiscal discipline, a reduction in wasteful expenditure, and the sealing of revenue leakages.

Source: Citinewsroom

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button